If an airplane has to be evacuated, the Federal Aviation Administration says all passengers must be capable of getting outwithin 90 seconds.
But critics say the agency’s testing standards have not kept pace with the shrinking size of airplane seats — which means more people jammed into the cabin — or the changing composition of the flying public.
“This is ridiculous. This is not how we travel today,” said U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) in an interview.
Duckworth argues the FAA’s current tests fail to take real world conditions into consideration.
“They did not mimic the seat density of a modern aircraft. They had no carry-on baggage. They had nobody over the age of 60 and nobody under the age of 18,” said Duckworth, a former Army helicopter pilot who lost both her legs in the Iraq war.
“They didn’t have anybody with a disability. Of course they were able to evacuate the aircraft in 90 seconds,” she said.
What I’m wondering is, how many deaths are attributable to slow evacuation? Usually, you only hear about the great catastrophies where the entire plan crashes into a mountain and evacuation was never an option.
But how many accidents cause a situation where quick emergency evacuations are actually needed? I have absolutely no intuition about that.
The flight polited by Captain Sully that crashed in a river would be the type of crash that has a timeline due to the plane sinking. Another situation with a need for a fast evacuation is a fire. Both are fairly rare because of all of the other safety measures taken when a metal tube filled with fuel takes off and lands over water.
People dying in either scenario because of a pursuit of profits would be terrible.
You mean like the Station Fire?