A different thing are conversation back and forths: each comment is in a new branch of the comment tree.

    • kurimizumi@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      At a wild guess, that you may upvote a comment that you support – but there’s a second part that you wouldn’t agree with. Or that people should split up their comments so that people can upvote/downvote individual parts?

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hi. I’d like to buy 51% of your stake of this upvote at 2x the current market value. This is an investment proposal and you have to accept now, I don’t have time for negotiations as I’m an important businessman conducting business.

          Rest assured me and my firm will not use our majority hold on your upvote to change or sway your held beliefs or writing style. Our lawyers do advise you that we absolutely have this power, though.

          Anyways, sign here please.

    • vacuumpizzas@t.bobamilktea.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think OP is referring to comment where multiple talking points are made, but you can’t selectively apply your upvote/downvote to specific parts of the comment. You either upvote it all, or downvote it all.

      So if I start talking about how pineapple is ok on a pizza, a downvote for this take also means you downvote how I’m trying to clarify OP’s message.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope I made it clearer by editing the post. Let me know if it’s still not clear :)

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You may be an exception, posting each part of what you wish to say in a different comment. But what I see the vast majority of the time is one comment per user per comment level.

      Just in case, I do not mean that, in a post, users don’t reply to different comments of the same level more than once. Rather, if you’re looking at comments like a tree, in each level of a single branch, you’re most likely to see a single comment by a user rather than many comments.

      I know there’s a difference between describing a behavior and describing a thought, but to the extent that our expectations are calibrated by other thoughts and observations, there’s a case for my argument.

      I have never seen someone advocating for “Split each part of your argument into a different comment!” Neither have I seen it in practice.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you find yourself typing a long comment that might have contradictions or presents several options, you should consider shortening it so that it only contains the most important point. Save the rest for follow up conversations. This makes a better conversation for several reasons besides voting.