• Johem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s nice and all, but we can’t be the solution by spending decisions and word of mouth of positive experiences with sustainable consumption. You semi-acknowledge that, but that’s dangerous. The time for positive gradual change was 20 years ago, it’s time to get nonviolently angry and demand change.

    We need everyone to realize that it’s far from enough to stop using plastic straws or eating less meat. We need fundamental societal and economic change that requires far more than simply adjusting consumption patterns.

    • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sure, if you can live that way while still turning the tide, great. It’s still going to take a shift in public opinion.

      I am not going to do anything but reinforce popular resentment towards everything green if I walk around as the angry Asian guy. They already hate me for existing here.

      But if I can convince my office of people that their next car is electric while touting the benefits of my car, that stuff spreads organically.

      • Johem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is that going electric already is a convenient lie we tell ourselves. We can’t just replace all cars with electric ones and rhinkbthat we’ve solved it. We need to realize that the level of individual mobility by personal vehicle we have today is not sustainable.

        Going electrical helps your individual emissions, sure, but we should be mindful that these are the pseudo solutions sold by people who would rather change nothing.