One person has been killed and several others injured on a Singapore Airlines flight from London that was hit by severe turbulence.

The Singapore-bound Boeing 777-300ER was diverted to Bangkok and landed at 15:45 local (08:00 GMT).

Flight SQ 321 was carrying a total of 211 passengers and 18 crew, the airline said in a statement.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, maybe when the rich (who fly a heck of a lot) start getting a little uncomfy we can actually do something about that climate change thing.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Haha! Ahhh yeah. Fun to think about but no, we’re way past that.

        However, private rail might make a comeback.

          • Baggie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re right, but once we’re feeling effects of that magnitude we’re already pretty much screwed. We’d need long term corrective action, and basically manually reverse all the damage we’ve done. it bought as well be teraforming at that point.

  • comrade19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    If 20 more were injured then the seatbelt sign probably wasn’t on, which means they probably hit clear air turbulence in cruise. Usually the planes ahead will report anything like that so the ones behind it will know what’s coming, but this must’ve been a big bit of windshear one out of nowhere.

  • Corngood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    One person has been killed and several others injured

    “I was covered in coffee,” Andrew from London tells our colleagues on 5 Live.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lol they clearly asked him what he personally experienced. I’m sure the dude would have started with “what happened to others on the flight is terrible” or similar

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This new flyer left his half filled coffee cup in the seat pocket and it got on my sweater on the way out, I had to wear a stink sweater with old coffee on my chest for the next 12 hours. I feel your pain Andrew from London

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh my god Andrew, that must’ve been simply awful for you, poppet

      We didn’t need the “from London” bit, we could tell by the way he’s a cunt

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The Boeing 777-300ER was designed and built in the early 2000s, long before Boeing had its current quality issues. From the “I’m not saying this happened” statement, it sounds like the person who died didn’t have a properly fastened seat belt.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yep, turbulence will affect any plane, it’s not like things would’ve been different on an Airbus.

        • Gilles_D@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          On a general note, I believe both 787 and A350 do possess a scintillometer to measure CTA to some degree.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      This has nothing to do with their newer malfunctioning planes. The 777 has been in service for over 30 years at this point.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “No way, the 777 isn’t THAT old of a plane!”

        <checks Wikipedia>

        First flight June 12, 1994 Introduction June 7, 1995

        Oh, that’s why my back hurts.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fuck Boeing for many reasons but I don’t expect them to control the weather ahead of their flights. I don’t get any indication from the article that there was any incompetence involved unless I missed something.