• Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s not forget that thread’s data collection is so atrocious that it didn’t launch in small and exotic markets like… Say… The whole of the EU.

  • Knightfall@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t mean this comment to be facetious towards OP.

    Seeing reports that interest died down on a newly released item, be it a game, social media, or tv series, is just to be expected. May as well report that water is still wet.

  • tr00st@lemmy.tr00st.co.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this a surprise? User retention is hard, and I’d expect this to hit even harder as time goes by. It’ll keep going up until the point where user growth matches attrition and I’d guess in the early days of a social platform, it’s going to take a while for background growth to increase that much and attrition will be pretty high given the lack of attachment.

    • kiddblur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also worth mentioning that on launch day, people in Europe were able to access it via VPN (not sure how big of a number of users that was), but they’ve since blocked those users. I’m sure that’s not a massive chunk, but it’s a chunk nonetheless

      • lucidwielder@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh get out of here w/ that. It’s not bad as much as it’s just stupid - it’s literally a top down approach to social media. Fb & instagram have already made it big so of course they can launch & pull whatever bs they want.

        It wasn’t organic & they hadn’t built anything w/ true merit & people are still tired of Zuck. He’s marginally better than musk these days at best. And maybe people aren’t as crazy about celebs & influencers wanting to be seen & heard as we all thought - as that’s not social media - that’s a Coca-cola commercial.

  • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m probably one of those. I joined because it was a low hanging fruit for an instagram user. It is basically twitter culture all over again. People complain that you’re just posting into a void on Mastodon but I get tons of responses over there. The real void is any mainstream social media where only the voice of influencers are amplified. The whole main feed is just 90% suggested posts. Why the fuck do I wanna see a post from Jake Paul or Mr. Beast?

      • Atramentous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get why that matters for big accounts. I will never understand why normal people prefer that, though. I much prefer engagement with people over consumption of content produced by popular influencers

    • Cyzaine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My experience as well. I blitzed and grinded followers cuz it was easy and why not. My feed is okay in general, but I had to follower 1.5kish people to get it that way.

      But I still get more than twice the engagement and meaningful engagement at that on Mastadon and Kbin, with less than half the followers. I also get little out of twitter, but I may be bad at it.

    • HipPriest@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I left Twitter back in 2016 when I realised I wasn’t using it anymore and it had come up in a you’ve been pwnd result. Figured I’d just delete the account instead of resetting the password and didn’t miss it.

      But I signed up to Mastodon today, because why not? I don’t really see why it’s being called hard to use. There’s some nice apps as well, which is making me more excited for a Kbin app when I wasn’t so bothered before…

  • plistig@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If half of the users who tried it out stuck around, then they’re incredibly successful.

  • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They didn’t lose anyone, its only been out for a short time. With the recent changes at twitter breaking all sorts of long time features Threads is poised to be its replacement.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They lost plenty of people, at least for now.

      What none of these articles seem to want to highlight is that this is completely normal retention behaviour. 50% week 1 retention isn’t excellent by any stretch of the imagination, but it’s well, well within the span of what’s normal.

      And Threads is still half baked.

    • wagesof@links.wageoffsite.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would any corporate anything want a privacy focused social media site? There’s no way to extract data or money from it. It’s not like they’re in the game to give you a service you want to use. Just enough to keep you generating data so they can sell you.