• figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hey! So you may have noticed that you got downvoted into oblivion here. It is because of the unnecessary amount of negativity in your comment.

    In communication, there are two parts - how it is delivered, and how it is received. In this interaction, you clearly stated your point: giving yourself the title of pro oftentimes means the person is not a pro.

    What they received, however, is far different. They received: ugh this sweaty asshole is gatekeeping coding.

    If your goal was to convince this person not to call themselves a pro going forward, this may have been a failed communication event.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      while your measured response is appreciated, I hardly consider a few dozen downvotes relevant, nor do I care in this case. It’s telling that those who did respond to my comment seem to assume I would consider myself a “pro” when that’s 1) nothing I said and 2) it should be clear from my comment that I consider the expression cringy. Outside memeable content, only idiots call themselves a “pro”. If something is my profession, I could see someone calling themselves a “professional <whatever>” (not that I would use it), but professional has a profoundly distinct ring to it, because it also refers to a code of conduct / a way to conduct business.

      “I’m a pro” and anything like it is just hot air coming from bullshitters who are mostly responsible for enshittification of any given technology.