• NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 个月前

    Others have been fairly random. GRBs sterilizing half the planet, asteroid impacts, simple microbiological species fighting for resources whilst unknowingly making their environments unlivable, etc., etc.

    In this case, the writing has been on the wall for decades, completely preventable, but here we are barrelling into it head first none-the-less. Dumber indeed.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 个月前

      Hardly. We conserve when we want to.

      The problem is that not everyone shares the same values, and so there are people who are willing to let some species go in exchange for a more comfortable lifestyle (with “more comfortable” in some cases meaning “not starving to death”). Values aren’t objective.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 个月前

        Sorry, I was absolutely dehumanizing and generalizing us as a species. Individually, you’re absolutely right, but the people who need to make the tough decisions to save us all won’t make them and will selfishly take us all into the end with them. Differentiating the subjective opinions and values, at the end of the day, doesn’t really matter.