![](https://midwest.social/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsh.itjust.works%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F75f90336-f369-44a4-9aa4-d8154702c0a0.png)
![](https://midwest.social/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F02b71bae-4741-425a-8e9e-c88d1bc143c6.png)
- cross-posted to:
- fuckcars@lemmy.world
During 2013–2017, casualty rates per 100 million miles were 5.16 (95% CI 4.92 to 5.42) for E- HE vehicles and 2.40 (95%CI 2.38 to 2.41) for ICE vehicles, indicating that collisions were twice as likely (RR 2.15; 95% CI 2.05 to 2.26) with E-HE vehicles. Poisson regression found no evidence that E-HE vehicles were more dangerous in rural environments (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11); but strong evidence that E-HE vehicles were three times more dangerous than ICE vehicles in urban environments (RR 2.97; 95% CI 2.41 to 3.7). Sensitivity analyses of missing data support main findings.
We have “whistlers” to supposedly give the deer/other animals warning a vehicle is approaching, maybe add a speaker system that just makes ICE sounds
Ideally we would be able to keep the benefit of quieter streets and parking lots though. Maybe there’s no getting around it