Ukraine will be able to use Danish and Dutch F-16s to strike into Russia, while Belgium is saying only for use in 1991-border Ukraine.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/Iv4Fu

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ukraine: “I consent.”

    Denmark: “I consent.”

    Russia: “Was there somebody you forgot to ask?”

    The myth of consentual flights of F-16s into Russian territory.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same way Russia forgot to ask Ukraine, Ukraine forgot to ask Russia. Seems fair.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The same ones that Russia and Ukraine hates? They can’t even agree on the meaning of them, since they are such an ambiguous mess that doesn’t specify anything.

            • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Skill issue on Russia’s part too. Let’s be fair here.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                No doubt. Russia placed too much faith in the OSCE and France and Germany approaching the process in good faith. Merkel later came out and said that the Minsk process was just a time-buying exercise so that NATO could arm Ukraine as a proxy against Russia.

                Ukraine, of course, knew that it was being armed and trained and had the carrot of NATO and EU membership dangled before it. Circling back to the original point, the fact that Ukraine was being armed and trained at such a rate is good evidence that Ukraine absolutely knew what was about to happen.

                • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Russia placed too much faith in the OSCE and France and Germany approaching the process in good faith.

                  I’m not sure if you’re calling Putin a stupid man that is easily manipulated or incompetent. No politician ever in their lives did anything in good faith, Putin included. You must be very naive to think that.

                  <…> good evidence that Ukraine absolutely knew what was about to happen.

                  That’s an empty speculation. Knowing and preparing for a possibly are completely different things. Also, if you note the timing on the war, it stared a month before a US company was about to start extracting oil and gas from the Ukraine territory and cut off Russia from Europe as supplier. The reason for the invasion was pure greed and not some stupid notions of NATO expansion or cries for help from Russian separatist groups.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Lmao what a cop out. At bare minimum Ukraine should have stopped allowing fascist paramilitary groups to shell civilians in the east, an act that was illegal a half a dozen other ways, too. And Angela Merkel admitted the agreements were not an attempt to actually resolve that issue or the issue of the west installing a hostile foreign government via coup, but to give Ukraine time to arm up to fight Russia:

            In an interview published in Germany’s Zeit magazine on Wednesday, former German chancellor Angela Merkel said that the Minsk agreements had been an attempt to “give Ukraine time” to build up its defences.

            https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-russia-may-have-make-ukraine-deal-one-day-partners-cheated-past-2022-12-09/

        • Skua@kbin.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well since neither of them included any sort of language to the effect of “Russia gets to invade if the terms of this agreement aren’t upheld”, I’m gonna go with more than two. Especially considering DPR forces kept pushing for Debaltseve after both agreements.

      • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The same way Ukraine forgot to ask the families of Jewish people killed in the Holocaust if they could put up statues and monuments commemorating Nazi collaborators including OUN members who participated in carrying out the Holocaust?

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the other hand, who gives a shit if Russia burns for their ongoing aggression.

      Not many people complain when an entire country reaches the “find out” part of “fuck around and find out” when they’ve had many years to course correct.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    The problem with the Danes is that they have been so sheltered for so long that the concept of their actions having consequences simply don’t register any more. Everything is going to be welfare, roast pork and padding ourselves on the back for all eternity, war and disaster and calamity is something they have in “the warm countries”, it will never affect us.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      So what happens if some Danish military bases get bombed or a frigate gets sunk with dozens of dead? Does Denmark pull back or call for WWIII?

      • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Lots of commotion internally in Denmark while the reaction would be decided upon in Washington.

        I don’t think Russia wants to retaliate so directly though. As I see it they have very little to gain from taking that bait. More likely acts of retaliation would be plausibly deniable cyber attacks or supporting some proxy in attacking Danish interests abroad. If I was a Danish troop in Iraq, I would be watching my back after this.

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Kremlin’s jets are flying over Ukraine and part of their barbaric land grab, why shouldn’t Ukrainians fly over Russia to stop attacks on their home?

    Go bomb the shit out of them. Shoot down the terrorist bombers launching missiles at markets and playgrounds.

  • applepie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nice gesture but why would Ukraine risk losing their new toys on adventurism where is work closer to to home to be done.

    Now if they were supplying rockets with ranges over 200km and then they gave consent to such use… That would be a more meaningful move and would let Russia know that using NK rockets has consequences.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nice gesture but why would Ukraine risk losing their new toys on adventurism where is work closer to to home to be done.

      Where the frontline is close to the official border, Russia is able to keep its artillery and logistics on the Russian side of the border where Ukraine is not allowed to use half of its equipment. Russia’s ongoing Kharkiv offensive is an example of this

      Now if they were supplying rockets with ranges over 200km

      France and Britain have been supplying the storm shadow missile, which has almost three times that range. Ukraine has been launching it from its own Su-24 aircraft, but those are very old and there aren’t a lot of them left. The F-16 could be a good new platform to launch them from. As I understand it, storm shadow and F-16 are not compatible out of the box and would need some modification, but the same was true for the Su-24 and that appears to have worked out

      • applepie@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Would Ukraine be able to fly planes close enough to strike within Russia given Russian strong anti air set up?

        Can Ukraine use stormshadows within Russia?

        • Skua@kbin.social
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well they’ve been flying Su-24s, and the F-16s certainly shouldn’t be any less capable than those for this sort of thing

          Can Ukraine use stormshadows within Russia?

          The UK okayed it a couple of weeks ago, France this week

            • Skua@kbin.social
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Oh, that I’m not sure of. I misunderstood what you were asking, sorry about that

              While I don’t know about actual jets launching munitions over Russian airspace, Ukraine did successfully hit a Shahed drone factory over 1,000 km from the Russia-Ukraine border with what appears to have been one of these light aircraft converted to be unmanned. So Russia’s air defence is definitely not impenetrable.

              • applepie@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Got it. I am aware of Ukraine striking deep into Russia but it has always been with their own tools.

                But back original all premises, I still doubt Ukraine would risk f16 getting that close to Russian air defense.

                Western missile are perfect for the job. Now that UK and fr on board, US must also approve and deliver a large batch for the party.

                Great opportunity to disrupt Russian ops near kharkiv IMHO and retaliate for NK missiles used there.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This means it is the US who has authorized them flying over Russian territory, Usually it is the country of origin that holds the right to specify how those arms should not be used.