Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    one of the follies of the early non-research internet was that the folks in charge of the more influential communities (Something Awful comes to mind) all tended to be weird fucking libertarian assholes insisting that debating fascists in a ā€œfree and fair environmentā€ (whatever that is) must be a good thing, we canā€™t just ban them on sight for some reason. generally these weird libertarian assholes were motivated by typical weird libertarian asshole things ā€” greed, or being fascists themselves.

    and all of these horseshit policies around not banning fascists ended in complete disaster for those communities and those libertarian shitheads (SA again), but somehow theyā€™re practically the only element of those early communities that carried over to the modern internet, likely because caring about community quality doesnā€™t make money, but pandering to nazi fuckwits does.

    it probably goes without saying, but I take the apparently radical stance that nobody needs to interact with fascists and assholes and I wonā€™t give their bullshit transit on any system I control. itā€™s always been surprising to me how many sysops consider ā€œkick out the fucking fascistsā€ an unworkable policy when itā€™s very easy to implement ā€” it only gets hard when you allow the worst fucking people you know to gain a foothold.

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      SA has been taken over by a non-shithead and now the moderation is ā€œyeah, you can fuck off nowā€ and itā€™s much nicer

      though tbf itā€™s greatly improved because weā€™re all old with bad backs now and arenā€™t putting up with dumb bullshit any more

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        7 months ago

        that is true! usually these assholes set things up so the communities they founded collapse when they leave (and from what Iā€™ve heard that almost happened to SA) so Iā€™m glad theyā€™re flourishing within their niche without said asshole parasocially positioned at the helm. I really should re-include the forums in the list of places I visit when Iā€™m bored.

    • deborah@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      to be fair, a lot of the early Internet, including the early research Internet, was driven by libertarian tendencies (which always ignored the dilemma in combining libertarian tendencies with the fact that the entire early Internet was enabled by massive government funding). John Perry Barlow, the EFF, etc. Itā€™s just that a lot of those people were libertarian utopians ā€“ and I will fully admit that in my youth it seemed very convincing. It felt like there were no space for bad actors because when the Internet was smaller, it was less obvious to idealists and the naĆÆve that a larger internet would be incredibly useful for bad actors.

      As recently as gamergate the EFF was loudly insisting that all moderation by private companies was wrong, and in the intervening few years they have only grudgingly and rarely admitted that overly libertarian moderation policies can suppress speech massively. And yet I fully believe all the EFF people mean well.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Iā€™m not up to date on my SA banning people lore, but hasnā€™t it also been several times that after people finally got banned from they made stuff infinitely worse? Like 4chan is from SA, but there was also a far right racist forum for people banned from SA, the my posting career people for example (at least I heard they were banned SA people, which could be a lie, we know how much they love multiple blankets of irony. Also their site is now dead thankfully).

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        7 months ago

        thereā€™s a direct line from SA not explicitly banning ironic naziism to anime nazis being everywhere and I fucking hate it

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          7 months ago

          Not just SA, but everywhere. We should have listened to the barmen of old better. (hope most of you are familiar with the barman who kicks out the polite nazi story).

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          7 months ago

          Yeah that is what I meant, that I heard it was setup by exSA neonazis. I wasnā€™t 100% sure.