Senator Sheldon Whitehouse calls audacious request ‘definition of corruption’ amid investigation into Mar-a-Lago meeting in April

The original exposé describing Trump’s offer to end US efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions and end environmental for a billion dollars regulation is here

  • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    32·
    24 days ago

    A Senate committee can do a few things:

    • It can propose changes to the language of US law so that our relatively weak bribery statutes are a closer to other developed countries
    • It can lay out the evidence for the American people and help get it widely covered in the press, reducing Trump’s odds of being elected again
    • It can deliver the evidence to the Justice Department with a recommendation for prosecution
    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldEnglish
      63·
      24 days ago

      It can lay out the evidence for the American people and help get it widely covered in the press, reducing Trump’s odds of being elected again

      Have you not been paying attention the last 8 years?

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        11·
        24 days ago

        Most people aren’t paying attention, and reminding them of Trump’s corruption is useful.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          22·
          24 days ago

          No no, you don’t understand.

          I’m not going to give you any suggestions or actually say anything, I’m just going to point out that what you’re saying won’t do anything. /s

          In case you’re confused, this is sarcasm. So far the people in here saying “this won’t do anything!” aren’t actually putting forth any suggestions - meaning they don’t know what they’re talking about.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.worldEnglish
      511·
      24 days ago

      So not much then. “Hey can you guys stop being corrupt? Here is an action plan that will stop you from being corrupt, we recommend you do something about the corruption, here is all your homework done for you”

      “Yea, yea, put it on the pile, it’s at the cylindrical file cabinet”

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        10·
        24 days ago

        Did you read their reply or just go ahead and make the statement you wanted to make?

        It’s ok to make the statement but don’t pretend the other commenter didn’t actually make valid points.

        Trump was just found guilty on 34 felonies and is the Republican nominee for president. It’s probably a good idea to go ahead document any other fuckery he’s up to while there’s time.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.worldEnglish
          49·
          24 days ago

          My main point is we have been here before, these things have been done before, and i have zero confidence in our system to hold him accountable. The post i responded to said that this will T-up actions for entities that actually have teeth. But so far these entities have been ineffective at best, obstructive at worst.

          • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            34·
            24 days ago

            None of this has ever happened or been done before. You think Putin would ever stand trial and get convicted by a jury? The system is far from perfect but your ignorant bullshit doesn’t hold a candle to it. You’re just like the morons campaigning for a collapse because you’re too naive, ignorant, and unmotivated to do anything at a local scale to influence progressive change. You want a plate served clean with only your feelings neatly arranged and anything else warrants systematic destruction. The only thing that separates you from trump is the chair you’re sitting in, some made up money, and presumably being convicted of 34 felonies for defrauding the public to undermine an election.