this time in open letter format! that’ll sure do it!

there are “risks”, which they are definite about - the risks are not hypothetical, the risks are real! it’s totes even had some acknowledgement in other places! totes real defs for sure this time guize

  • froztbyte@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    those fucking asks, though

    We therefore call upon advanced AI companies to commit to these principles:

    That the company will not enter into or enforce any agreement that prohibits “disparagement” or criticism

    subtooting the real openai, will the real openai please stand up

    “pls mr openai will you not kill all my shares pls I believed so hard?”

    That the company will facilitate a verifiably anonymous process for current and former employees to raise risk-related

    “I believe I was unfairly edged out because of my beliefs and I want to speak to the manager”

    That the company will support a culture of open criticism

    oh yeah that sounds kinda good

    and allow its current and former employees to raise risk-related concerns about its technologies to the public,

    oh.

    That the company will not retaliate against current and former employees who publicly share risk-related confidential information after other processes have failed.

    “rlyrlypls mropenai, plsnotakeshaare. I believed so hard 🥹🥹🥹🥹”

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      subtooting the real openai, will the real openai please stand up

      Funny you would mention the real openAI, as openAI is apparantly 3 different companies (one a non-profit, an LLC and one more) which have some complex ownership/oversight relationship which is very weird looking to me. (The Ed guy (sorry forgot the rest of his name+blog) linked here before had a post on that).