• TheHooligan95@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, almost nothing would be. Yours is a NONargument because it completely kills the discourse. But that’s beside the point. Some billionares do work hard because they happened across a smart idea and they were able to make it flourish.

        Not saying that Bezos in 2023 deserves all the money he has because I dislike Amazon, but you still can’t deny that it was an idea that changed in just a decade the entire way a society thinks about shopping.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Why is an overwhelming, correct argument that ends the discourse a bad thing if you already admit it’s correct?

        • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          So because he had an idea and workers realized that idea for him and those workers make that idea be maintained for him makes it fine for them to be exploited? Also I doubt that those people at the top manage shit, they just have another workers manage this stuff for them.

          • TheHooligan95@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s just dingeneous and completely disregarding how things actually work. Did he clean the bathrooms? Of course not. But he did coordinate his team of workers by creating other teams of worker where at the end there were people who coded and shipped everything. If you think that would be easy to do you have a rude awakening waiting for you lmao.

            I mean to say, that it is probably the hardest or among the hardest roles.

            • hondacivic@lem.sabross.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Following this logic you don’t work very hard.

              The one who works hard is the worker you depend on. That worker can go work elsewhere, but you need him. Pay him his worth, because he’s literally the support pillar. I’m sure you know what happens when there’s no support pillar.

              It’s not because you tell people what to do that you work harder. Those people could have done it themselves, but they didn’t have the money to start something as big as amazon. It’s all about how much money you have to invest, not hard work.

              Some billionares do work hard because they happened across a smart idea and they were able to make it flourish.

              Smart ideas with money to invest = hard worker

              Smart ideas but poor = ???

              • OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah plus even if they don’t have the ideas working in a warehouse moving stuff is harder than talking and arranging things with people

                • hondacivic@lem.sabross.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  i’d take a life of “how am i gonna spend this money wisely” over a life of “how am i gonna make it this month”

      • Mocking Moniker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        5 months ago

        Stewardship is hard to learn. Most people won’t have the discipline not would they take the risks. I studied business.

        • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Those people would be NOTHING if not for all other workers. It’s a team game and the entire team should be rewarded and treated with respect. I’m not saying we should pay every job the same wage, I’m saying that all of the money shouldn’t flow to the few select people while the rest gets scrumbles.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah they pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, with nothing more then a couple of million from their parents.

      • Mocking Moniker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not fair but it’s the only way. Stewardship is hard. Business is hard and risky. People often fail to recognize the risky nature.

        • exanime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Trump has literally failed at every business ventured he has spearheaded… he is still a billionaire… where is the risk again?

          • Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 months ago

            And those people can take “risks” multiple times with their connections made through money because they can afford that. Oh? What are you saying? If they can take the risks safely it means they aren’t actually risks? Oh well…

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I have no problem with people making money. Why would I have a problem with people making money if they’re successful?

          These people are not successful because of their talent, they are successful because they have money. Success breeds success and riches breed more riches. If they do well enough they can stick everything in a high interest saver account and live off the interest.

          So it’s a bit rich when they claim to be some big shot and to lecture everyone else on their secret magic talent, which is usually nothing else other than they were lucky with their birthright.

          See Donald Trump is a classic example of this. The man couldn’t think his out way out a wet paper bag, and yet he’s fabulously wealthy even if he’s lying about 90% of his income he still has more money than most people would know what to do with. Everything he is is because of his father, all of his success has been despite his personal “accomplishments” not because of them.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      People can live comfortably and still work hard. It’s almost like poverty doesn’t encourage work, but infact only makes life more difficult and stressful in myriad ways, ultimately decreasing effective productivity.