• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s always so funny when car brains suddenly discover their heart for disabled people when they desperately reach for arguments against non car centric traffic planning. If you’re genuinely concerned about disabled people and those who can’t drive for other reasons (poverty springs to mind) you should advocate for transport options besides cars.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      A variety of transport options for a variety of preferences and disabilities. Some people have a disability that prevents them from cycling, others from walking, others from driving. Only building car centric is still unfair to those who cannot drive due to disability, age, or skill. Only building bike lanes and no transit or car lanes can also be unfair. Multiple options is the most fair in most scenarios.

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly. We need multiple options and realistic options for people with limitations. It’s way too common on this community for people to call everybody a car brain just because they have trouble riding a bike.

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am a disabled person and I vote for transportation levies and taxes every time they come up, but nice trying to pretend that I’m a car brain just because I happen to need one.

      Once again, ableism. Don’t assume everybody is not disabled just because you don’t see them in a wheelchair.