• PapaStevesy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well, we call it chemistry, but the forces at play existed long before we even knew to name them.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I understand. But if it’s isolated it’s considered non reactive. (I manage a hazmat DOT fleet)

        • PapaStevesy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok? That’s neat, I just fail to see the relevance I guess. A god would be harmless too, if it was isolated from the rest of the universe.

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m asking how it’s going to react with stuff. In like a basic chemistry kind of way.

            • PapaStevesy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Seems like something a hazmat DOT fleet manager would already know though, so I guess I just don’t know why you’re asking that. And truthfully, I don’t particularly care, as, again, I fail to see the relevance. I mean like, if it’s real chemical kinetic information that you’re after, there are innumerable better sources than the comments section of a meme page on a fringe social media platform. If you’re trying to make a point about my original tongue-in-cheek comparison, feel free to make it.

              • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Ok. You can just accept you’re wrong rather than double downing and sounding less educated than you originally did.

                • PapaStevesy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Mmm yes, because “double downing” is a phrase an educated person uses. Got it, lolol.

                  Look, I would totally accept that I was wrong if I knew what you were referring to, but I literally don’t know, you haven’t explained your opinion at all. Like, please! Tell me what you mean! What am I wrong about?

                  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Like totally. Because educated people don’t know modern lingo or anything. No cap. Your argument is so mid.