• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m sure someone will challenge it in the EU then at some point.

      In the US not all licenses are transferable, and that includes things like “accounts”.

      Valve and gog have the same policy. I’m fairly confident that both of them didn’t decide to violate the law in the same way that’s also consistent with how other digital licensing arrangements work without consulting with some lawyers on their user agreements.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t know what to tell you beyond “in the US, not all licenses are transferable”. Different countries have different laws.

          It’s a pretty well trod area of law, so it’s not really contentious that it’s a legal license term in the US.
          https://www.shadesofgraylaw.com/2009/12/14/cant-transfer-this/ is an example. It’s less tested for consumers.

          The lawyers are definitely there to protect the company. No lawyer is ever there to follow the intent of the law, because it’s the letter that matters in almost every circumstance.
          Knowingly adding an illegal term to the terms of the agreement is a great way to not only fail to protect the company, because the entire thing might get tossed out, but to risk professional consequences.

          Even the Microsoft terms of service say “non-transferable unless you’re in Germany or other EU jurisdiction where such clauses are unenforceable”.