• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.

      You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.

      Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.

      I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your proof that I hate the guy is ina comment where I said he wasn’t involved? I know logic is difficult for you but you can do better.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              The question mark at the end of a sentence is an indication that a question was asked. Was that too difficult of a question for you to answer?

                • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It wasn’t a difficult question

                  Then you would have answered it.

                  it just showed how little you understood my argument.

                  Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.

                  Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.