• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t even have to go as far as calling it a Russian hoax. In April of this year, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee investigating Hunter’s laptop found no wrongdoing. Do you believe the Republican House Committee specially tasked with finding in timing evidence in his emails are also part of the hoax?

      No, the Russian hoax was a false claim that the laptop and the emails were fake. No evidence of wrong doing by Joe does not change the authenticity of the laptop.

      Would you rather I double-down on the wrong thing? No wait that’s what Republicans do.

      You just keep changing the reason you objected to my reply, first it was asking for a source, then the source “didn’t prove shit”, then Hunter confirming emails shut you up about that, then you bounced to its not relivent, now you seem to be arguing that there is no evidence of wrong doing by Joe, which is strange as I’ve been saying that through this thread.

      You’re making up an accusation I made about you.

      Also you

      It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry.

      There’s no reason to lie.

      I’m simply looking for you to directly address that this is not related to Joe and that Hunter is irrelevant. Why won’t you just state it?

      Emails showing Hunter and his buddies trying to set up corrupt deals with Joe isn’t relivent? That’s certainly worth looking into.

      In other words, would it be more/less/same relevance for me to post an article about some shit one of TFG’s kids may or may not have done?

      Who is TFG? If TFG is an elected official and there is evidence of TFGs kids scheming to involve TFG then yes.