• Kalothar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      That is not necessarily true, there are scarce but nonbiblical references to Jesus. Such as the execution of James described in Antiquities references him as “the Brother of Jesus, the one they call Messiah”.

      I’m hardcore atheist myself, but you are damn right Jesus The Christ is a fabrication like Santa Claus. I’m just saying there is nuance.

      Also interesting note is Rome loved crucifiying people for Sedition.

      Turns out walking around saying you’re the King of The Jews isn’t cool with the Roman nobility, and guess what he wasn’t the first it to do it either. They crucified someone around 4BCE for the exact same thing

      Anthronges

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        The last I knew, the best evidence against Jesus the Christ being real was the distinct lack of recording by any contemporary Roman writings. But I may be remembering wrong.

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Well, if you have good evidence to disprove the majority of academics and blow the lid off a major conspiracy I would love to read your papers.

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            Because proving a negative is how things work now? What.

            How about you prove he did exist, and not using “evidence” from a church affiliated “historian”.

            • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              How about you disprove the evidence we have instead of pulling shit out of your ass? Start with why you think Josephus accounts aren’t trustworthy.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                You can’t disprove a negative. You can keep “demanding” me to all you want, but it’s not how things work.

                What’s the evidence you have?
                All of the notes for Josephus on wikipedia are from people that were either associated with the church or wrote non-fiction books about religious leaders.

                Take that as you will. I understand Faith is a strong thing, but evidence and science is how the world actually works.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              You’re rejecting evidence you haven’t even read about, so yes. You get the burden of proof for now. You’re making an assumption that every academic who says “there’s enough evidence to suggest this person existed just not exactly how it’s laid out in the bible” is some religious zealot. Show us proof.

                • zaph@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  I’m not going to link to a bunch of different papers for you since you can’t be bothered to Google before you comment so here’s a Wikipedia article. If you’re here in good faith you’ll know how to follow the sources and find the evidence, if not you’ll reply with some more idiotic denialism.

                  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    There is evidence a “prophet named Jesus” existed. Of course “Jesus” was an extremely popular name. And there were tens of thousands of “Prophets” running around claiming they were the true one.

                    It’s simple survivorship bias. There is ZERO evidence the biblical Jesus existed…

                  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    That’s fair. I don’t mind looking into the article.

                    The first, and subsequently multiple, source in the article claiming that Jesus was real is from William R. Herzog. He was a Presbyterian minister.

                    Mark Allen Powel is also sourced. An ordained minister of the American Lutheran Church.

                    I’ll look into more of it later, I’ve got things to do. But so far it’s all church members affirming the belief.