Image of tweet by Kim from Kansas @kim_from_kansas:
Capitalists would like you to believe that liberalism is the left-most edge of the economic spectrum, precisely because it is the left-most point on the spectrum that doesn’t threaten their power.
True leftism threatens the power of capitalists. Liberalism is not leftism.

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, we’re all agreed then that tankies aren’t leftist, right? Because the claimed “communist” countries, such as Russia and China, are extremely capitalist in the worst possible ways.

    • Veraxus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Leftists must not abide the consolidation or entrenchment of power & power (the two are the same).

      Tankies justify this, and are therefore garden variety right wing authoritarians.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I think of “neo-liberals”, I think of corporate Democrats. They serve their own set of wealthy oligarchs, and do minimal lip service to the needs of normal people. They are in the center. The right has gone completely off the spectrum into an authoritarian fascist nightmare. There are many billionaire oligarchs who fund them and create their media propaganda. I’m progressive. I suppose some think that is the “left”, but it’s really just wanting government policy which prioritizes the needs of working people.

    • MemeCollector@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      but it’s really just wanting government policy which prioritizes the needs of working people.

      A literal impossibility as long as capitalism exists

    • buttermilk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m struggling slightly to understand your point. Are you saying this in contrast to the point made in the post, as in stand together as leftist and liberals in the fight against fascism?

        • buttermilk@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the objection that myself and other leftists would offer, is that the fight is against fascism is fundamentally a fight against, white supremacist, capitalist, patriarchy, and that capitalism is in many ways a progenitor and protector of the other two. The wealth generated by capital, captures regulatory bodies, manipulates voters, generates disinformation, all in service of perpetuating itself. A notable example is in your own comment, the power of the capital used by the fossil fuel industries to influence elections, buy political power, misinform voters, because the base scientific reality is that their industry cannot function in a world that is inhabited by people.

          So for fossil fuels and tangentially, billionaires, the global issues cannot be tackled without recognizing that the core of capitalism is itself a vital part of the building of fascism.

          To re-frame this in hopes of giving insight, imagine we were talking about racial justice in America, and one party was arguing that with various other ways to fight inequality, the police as an institution, have fundamentally rotten, and end goal needs to be abolition. The other party argues that we need to come together and stop the right wing fascists like proud boys, et al, that support white supremacy. So when you say we need to come together and tackle the issues without dismantling the tools that are use to create them, it sounds hallow.

                • buttermilk@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Indeed! So if liberalism as an ideology, wants to keep billionaires, don’t you think it’s a little counter to that logic to say liberals and leftists need to come together and not dismantle the primary driver of fascism?

      • Cal_216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Generally, liberals are too feckless to fight fascism. But if some of want to join, I guess so.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is so weird to anyone outside the US because your ‘left’ party is …definitely not. In some countries they’re further right than right wing parties.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you’re an Aussie there’s a whooole extra layer of joke here

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalist bastardisation of liberalism is not liberalism. Capitalism does not create freedom/liberty/rights unlike liberalism. Capitalist is always an antiliberal hierarchy.

    Liberalism is anticapitalist by nature. So is leftism. They can overlap or they can be separate.