• bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    You got me, there is no war machine. I’m making it up. Eisenhower was lying when he warned us about this.

    • StinkyOnions@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Never said there wasn’t.

      I’m just pointing out that you don’t even know how your own government works, that is, if you’re even American.

      • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        You should use this keen awareness of how the government really works for the benefit of mankind. I do like going straight to the Russian bot thing, always a winner.

        • StinkyOnions@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Gee, I didn’t know not being American means you’re automatically Russian. Either way, you’re intentionally missing the entire point of my replies. You don’t know how your own government works. Helping Ukraine in no way is draining tax payer money, ya dunce.

          • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m all about modern monetary theory, so I get that taxes do not 1-1 equate to spending, taxation is an arbitrary anti-inflationary mechanism while spending is an arbitrary inflationary mechanism when you’re a large country with a big economy people want to business in while printing ‘me’ bucks – and I get the argument that “it’s creating American jobs,” but mostly it’s making defense company execs rich, which is overall inflationary, which is a regressive tax on us all in the end… so… every $100 billion we spend there like it’s nothing isn’t entirely non-impactful on our economy. Also, now that treasury bonds aren’t at effectively 0% anymore this is producing net drag on the budget, insofar as how congress sees it, and they do the budgeting, ergo the $x billion we’re paying on the $y billion we’ve sent to Ukraine is reducing funding to something domestic in budget negotiations, or will eventually when the interest compounds back into the debt and the GOP goes all “Austerity forever!” the next time they’re out of power, which in your ideal world will be next year.

            • StinkyOnions@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              …you do realize that Ukraine is only getting a surplus of US equipment that was going to be replaced? Totaling the amount of those Ukraine defense bills? There is no money being exchanged, lol.

              • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 months ago

                So if it’s all unloading military surplus, why any congressional holdups about budgeting? Have you broken a scandal? Hundreds of billions have been budgeted, I would think the GAO et al would want to know about what you’ve discovered!