miles@lemm.ee to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoWhich TLDs are too risky for hosting?message-squaremessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up178arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up178arrow-down1message-squareWhich TLDs are too risky for hosting?miles@lemm.ee to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square51fedilinkfile-text
With several Lemmy instances using the .ml TLD I’ve seen people mention others being risky as well. Which should be avoided?
minus-squareoleorun@lemmy.fanlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI’ve got the DS923+. It’s replacing a very old but very functional QNAP that I’ve had for years. Alas, QTS or whatever the OS is called is slow and clunky and after using our DS920+ at work I made the decision to get a Synology.
I’ve got the DS923+. It’s replacing a very old but very functional QNAP that I’ve had for years. Alas, QTS or whatever the OS is called is slow and clunky and after using our DS920+ at work I made the decision to get a Synology.