• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are systemic issues core to how Capitalist systems are set up, and the violent arm that upholds these is the police.

    Does that make sense?

    • duffman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Your comment speaks to high level concepts but you didn’t provide an the example to ground it to reality.

      Like others have mentioned they aren’t seeing these examples of core issues having impacts on their day to day lives/communities. I’m not either. When it comes down to it, laws written to apply to everyone are generally enforced for everyone.

      Catching violent perpetrators pretty much always takes priority over non-violent theft. When we see acts of violence get immediate police attention it feels like the image you are trying to portay is inaccurate.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I am not referring to unequal application of the law, but the law itself and the police as its enforcers.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Cool. Now give real actionable examples of this stuff happening. I’m not saying it doesn’t, I’m fairly sure it does. People keep prodding you for SPECIFIC EXAMPLES though, not just a definition.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The violence of Capitalism is ensured by Private Property Rights, ie Capitalists can exist. Without police, Capitalism would not exist.

            Redlining as a concept is practiced to this day.

            What do you mean a “specific example?”

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Cases where this has happened. Articles detailing actual, specific, times that these things have happened.

              To be clear - I agree with you. I’m merely trying to point out why people seem to be talking past you, and you past them.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Where what has happened, Capitalism remaining legal and enforced via state violence? That’s the status quo almost everywhere.

                • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m not going to keep going on this rhetoric treadmill with you. Once again, I agree in bulk with what you’re saying, I’m merely trying to point out why you’re not really having an impact with the words you’re saying. Im reasonably sure you know exactly what kinds of examples people want to see. Both refusing to supply them or acting ignorant to the request degrade your argument and make it feel like you aren’t arguing in good faith, you’re just shouting talking points.