Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

  • zewm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    For me is because it’s so fucking slow. As soon as I disable ipv6 on every device it has better speeds.

    IPv6 is trash.

    • orangeboats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tell that to your ISP which has fucked their IPv6 deployment up. In my experience IPv6 is actually faster since it bypasses the IPv4 CGNAT.

      On busy days my IPv4 connection can get as slow as 15KB/s, now that’s trash.

      • frezik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s one practical thing. Routers have had years to optimize IPv4 routing, which has to be redone for IPv6. Same with networking stacks in general.

        In theory, IPv6 should be faster by not having to do bullshit like CGNAT. There’s every reason to think it’ll match that advantage if we just make it happen.