• kora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Which they’ve shown they aren’t willing to do…

        Personally, YT premium is my only subscription I have, and wouldn’t really have any others if money wasn’t this tight. But I was paying before this recent anti blocker war, I prefer YT Music just because of the way it handles a bunch of the music remixed by seperate and probably not “official” artists. And with how much youtube I watch on mobile instead of my PC, messing with blocking wasn’t very appealing to me, since the jump from YTmusic to full premium is less than almost any streaming sub.

        But I have always watched/backgroundnoised a lot of youtube, so its not that much of pain. Realistically, this was bound to happen eventually, hosting that much content hasn’t really gone down in costs as quickly as most tech overhead. But its a fairly complex line item, not just hardware & facilities, but all the law office hours related to copyright log is an ongoing and probably still growing cost for them and since they are not Disney thats a real cost I’d imagine.

        As a side note, it just reminds me how shockingly unaware I am of how much they must value our personal data, that it only just now became worthwile to fight blockers with this much effort and PR/image depreciation.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah but on one hand the price they want I’m not willing to pay, but if I could get it for less then I’d consider it.

          • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            It’s only worth what people are willing to pay. Already have Spotify anyways and not a fan of googles app killing tactics, learned that the hard way a couple times.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Jesus Christ google, how much money are you spending to foil 0.000034% of your user base

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      The purpose, is to keep it difficult enough that the “honest” person doesn’t get the idea to start doing it.

      Same concept as putting a lock on your front door. It’s not to stop thieves, it’s to stop the average person from getting the idea to “just take a quick look”.

      By occasional going after workarounds AND making it public news. Your average computer user thinks it’s not worth the hassle.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If they don’t want honest people considering it, maybe they shouldn’t raise the price by 80% in a single price change.

        I paid for YouTube premium when it was first available. They guaranteed the price would never change as I was a first adopter. Then they did. Then they did it again. And then again.

        Google can fuck off. They have all the money in the world and they need to extort the people who helped grow their business.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I can watch Youtube without ads using an adblocker or NewPipe. Why anyone buys Premium is beyond me.

  • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Its too fucking expensive for what you get. Throw in access to all movires and TV for $15, then maybe I’ll subscribe.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    The article is only based on a handful of accounts from reddit, but it would be quite funny considering how many people I’ve encountered who do this and think they are geniuses or morally superior because they don’t use an ad-blocker. Let’s see how they feel after a fee hike. :)

    • Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t really understand who you are getting at here. Everyone I know uses this combined with regular ad blockers. Anyway, once they figure out how to properly inject ads into the stream blocking is going to get really hard.

      • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I would not pay anyway. This is a principled position after I was shown a fraudulent advertisement 10 times in one evening (which used children with cancer to manipulate emotions)

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    I tried to get brazillian youtube premium or whatever and it just didn’t work.

    • lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I did a South American country once too but the payment processor has a snafu and it stopped working after the 2nd month. I just spun up a personal invidious VM and moved on with my life.