• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Polling, usually. Otherwise primary results. Most states did have their primary, btw, only a handful cancelled. Each state has their own way of doing it.

    Can you name a candidate that was doing well at any point? Better than low single-digits? Dean was the only one I heard much about.

    edit: You do remember the write-in uncommitted thing, right? Those were primaries.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The early primary states were specifically changed to states where Bidens poll numbers were strongest. And yes, the early primary winners carry that momentum into states where they might be less popular. They didn’t have to change the primary order, but chose to, to help Biden.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Okay then, next was SC and Nevada. How far do we have to go before we see these changes? And who was the contender that was hurt by the changes?

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Here’s all the changes.

              Literally anyone could’ve been a contender. We don’t know who they are, because the party never wanted to seriously entertain anyone other than Biden.

              Contrast that with what the Republicans did. They had several debates with anyone who felt like giving it a shot. Trump decided he didn’t need participate, and was right. The Democrats could have done similar but refused to.

              Biden is too elderly. Trump is too many kinds of wrong. Most people know this. If the Democratic party figures out that Biden is almost the only candates weaker than trump, they’ll be able to win.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                So, that’s pretty much the same order as always, not seeing how that helps anyone.

                And you can look up who runs if you want. You do not need to see debates to figure it out, someone announces after they file their paperwork, then its up to them to convince people to support them. You’re pretending like the DNC needs to do all this work to serve us up a platter of great options, but ignoring that it’s the candidates that determine how they get received. Don’t forget, most Americans still hate the idea of communism, too, even if they don’t actually know what it is.

                This conspiracy theory nonsense is getting tiresome. The real world isn’t that simple.

                • Steve@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  That’s a very capitalistic form of democracy. Candates need to pull themselves up by their boot straps.

                  While the Republicans promote socialistic politics, giving candates universal basic airtime.

                  I get it now.

                  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’d say both the parties are pretty capitalist. The repubs were interested in finding their challenger, they didn’t know who it would be yet. The dems, all the way down to the majority of voters, were interested in supporting their incumbent, not interested in a chaotic primary fight.

                    I think that’s still largely the case.