The Supreme Court on Friday overturned a landmark 40-year-old decision that gave federal agencies broad regulatory power, upending their authority to issue regulations unless Congress has spoken clearly.

  • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Dred Scott?

    Sometimes precedent is plain wrong.

    ETA: not in this instance though. This was a time they should have respected precedent.

    • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, an incredibly racist ruling is a great comparison to dismantling the administrative state, removing personal healthcare choices, and regulatory authority.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dred Scott is the exception that proves the rule.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s actually not, which makes it a worse response. It wasn’t overturned by a court which is what state decisis applies to (Stare decisis is the doctrine that courts will adhere to precedent in making their decisions.) Dred Scott was overturned by the 13th & 14th amendments.