• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’d sure think so from some of these responses.

      But I do enjoy the person who thinks you need to get consent from a baby to ethically take its picture.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        We’re talking about in the nuddy here, in which case you really should have a good case for taking that photo.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          The good case is that the child was just born and didn’t come out clothed. Something many of you don’t seem to understand.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          So many of you think babies come out clothed.

          You also have this absolutely ludicrous idea in your heads that having a naked photo of your baby is child pornography. And yet none of you have an example of a parent facing legal repercussions for it. And somehow that doesn’t clue you in that it is, in fact, not child pornography.

          And then there’s the Finnish guy who is telling you all what prudes you are. One of the few sane takes.

          • ji17br@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Seems like these people are sexualizing babies and then making you seem like the crazy one. It’s kind of insane.

          • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Thanks, please carry on telling me what kind of ideas I have. Forgive me for thinking babies have some rights.

            No one said it’s child porn. It’s just that when parents show off your naked baby pictures it gets uncomfortable for everyone, as many here have expressed.

              • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                Multiple people have also said it’s wrong to do that, so… carry on cherry picking I guess. But sure, if you think it’s ethical to go around flashing your kids genitals, then carry on I guess. You can’t fix stupid.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You said no one said it’s child porn.

                  They have. Multiple times.

                  I also never said I went around flashing my kids’ genitals. I don’t know why you have to lie like this in order to criticize me.

                • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  He’s been going to bat for showing people photos of his kid’s bits all day, he’s too far dug in to ever admit he’s wrong.

                  You’re right, you definitely can’t fix stupid. Man just wants to violate his child’s privacy.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Naked photos of children is pretty much the definition of CP, yes.

            A parent is unlikely to face prosecution unless they share the photos, but that doesn’t mean it’s legal.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                See, this is on par with arguing semantics around how it’s not pedophilia because the victim wasn’t prepubescent. You may be technically right, but the fact that you’re making the argument is gross.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It’s really not.

                  It’s not porn, because it’s not porn.

                  It’s not our fault that you think of everything as sexual.

                  There is nothing sexual about a naked body. If you ever can, do come visit Finland. By your logic, anyone visiting a sauna with someone else there is either committing or being the victim of a sex crime? (You’re not allowed to wear a bathing suit in the sauna for health reasons.)

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And yet you claimed I have child porn and that I am abusing my child.

                  When are you going to contact lemmy.world admin to have me reported to the authorities for child abuse and the possession of child pornography?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          If it’s child porn, you show me one single parent who has gotten in trouble for just taking a picture of their baby when it’s naked and showing that picture to their adult child’s partner.

          One single parent.