• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is that way, but it shouldn’t be that way. Bail unfairly targets the poor. Filing appeals should be standard procedure when you’re deciding whether or not someone has to spend years in a prison.

    • AttackBunny@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aren’t they in CA? CA cash bail programs recently.

      Guess these two fall into the exception part. Where no one is sure they will show up in court.

    • FlowVoid
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some places have done away with bail on the basis that it targets the poor, like NJ, IL and the UK. But eliminating bail does not mean eliminating all pretrial detention. This couple would be in pretrial detention even in states without ball, because their own actions made them a flight risk.

      And appeals are meant to be used when you think the judge made a legal error, not when you simply don’t agree with the law. If you can’t acknowledge that a correctly applied law may be used against you, then your trial will take longer than most.