Maybe it’s just selection bias, but I feel like there were a lot more alleged recordings of paranormal activity going around back when most video and audio was recorded on analog media, compared to after 2004-2005 when Sony Hi8 Handycams hit the lights on the way out and digital took over.

Is that because ghosts can slip through the gaps between the 0s and 1s, but magnetic heads force them into the visible plane? Or is it because people didn’t have widely available CG animation dulling their imaginations? Or perhaps it’s unrelated - did Saddam simply take all the ghosts with him into the afterlife?

I would love to hear your thoughts, and if you make recordings when you go ghost hunting, I’d love to hear about your gear setup.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Analogue recordings of poor quality aren’t the same as poor quality digital recordings. The lack of quality in analogue recordings made the appearance of “paranormal” easier to claim.

    Isn’t it interesting how as quality improved, paranormal sightings decreased.