seth@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agoJohn Deere lays off hundreds of employees, after a $10B profit yearfranknez.comexternal-linkmessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1778arrow-down110
arrow-up1768arrow-down1external-linkJohn Deere lays off hundreds of employees, after a $10B profit yearfranknez.comseth@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-squareBobDolesBBallHandle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 months agoAgreed. I don’t know much about the source but it might just be an indication of the author’s intent, if there is a human author. There is a much better image choice to be used and it would not take much effort. Update: Saw the pic, read the article, but didn’t realize the forum until afterwards. Will just move and pretend.
minus-squareZipitydew@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoI just noticed other articles about California and Michigan. They also used Newsome and Whitmer as the image. But then another for Georgia did not use Kemp as the image.
minus-squareZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoAll three have one thing in common: named as potential replacements. Media moves quick to burn.
minus-squareBobDolesBBallHandle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoSounds like there is a motive. Typically I sample the headlines and read a site’s “About Us” page before diving in. It was early, I saw a familiar face, and started reading. Also this very subgroup is a tad bit too general for my taste. Never again.
Agreed. I don’t know much about the source but it might just be an indication of the author’s intent, if there is a human author.
There is a much better image choice to be used and it would not take much effort.
Update: Saw the pic, read the article, but didn’t realize the forum until afterwards. Will just move and pretend.
I just noticed other articles about California and Michigan. They also used Newsome and Whitmer as the image. But then another for Georgia did not use Kemp as the image.
All three have one thing in common: named as potential replacements.
Media moves quick to burn.
Sounds like there is a motive. Typically I sample the headlines and read a site’s “About Us” page before diving in.
It was early, I saw a familiar face, and started reading. Also this very subgroup is a tad bit too general for my taste. Never again.