• sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    ·
    4 months ago

    If something requires an “app” and a connection to “the cloud” for basic functionality, don’t buy it. This sort of abandonment by the manufacturer will always happen. Maybe it will last longer. Maybe it will be next week. But once the company has your money, the last thing they want to do is to spend any of that money providing you with support.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      The funny thing about this is that the first time I had that moment of realization was when I got the Sphero BB-8 toy from my kids for Christmas. It had a dedicated app. The reason it’s funny is because, out of all the things that I own, it’s the only app-driven one that still works. Sphero just merged it into their main app. Once that app stops getting updated, this toy will cease to work despite everything about it being functional. ☹️

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is why i am for mandatory open sourcing of abandonware. So much stuff just laying wasted that could be hacked.

        But allowing you to diy your own toys might make you consume less and thats bad or something.

      • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        As long as you can side load a functional apk to a supported Android device, it should work, no?

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          Android eventually locks out apps designed for older APIs. I remember reading about a bunch of abandoned apps being dropped from the Play Store for that reason. Not sure if that’s just the Play Store though or if it is the Android OS itself. I haven’t ever kept a phone beyond the manufacturer providing security updates since I actually use my phone for secure things.

          • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You have to enable developer mode and install with --bypass-low-target-sdk-block now.

            Dunno if they’ll remove that eventually

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Don’t say that so loud.

              You’ll have the self-proclaimed “power users” that just copy things they see posted without knowing what it does or possible issues and side effects, doing this and then complaining about issues stemming from it. And never disclosing they did it, blaming it on the system as a whole, ignoring the bypass they did.

              Oh wait, this isn’t the Windows community.

        • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Only if it works as a peer to peer, if the device depends on connecting to a company’s server (which all do since the whole point was to collect usage habits) then you’re shit out of luck whenever they decide you’re

      • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s funny, I have the exact same toy. It was a Father’s day gift years ago. It’s now an expensive display piece, as the battery no longer seems to hold a charge. And, as best I can tell, the battery is well sealed inside, making replacement impossible. Yet another thing I hate about our disposable culture.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not sure but that’s a potential solution. You’d have to find the older APK somewhere but I feel like it should work since it’s just a Bluetooth connection to the toy.

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m laughing my ass off thinking about all the steps required to get these working if you bought them new. downloading an app and pairing your shoes to wifi or some shit. ha

      if the internet goes down can you still put on your shoes?! lmao!

      • Norodix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Its still stupid. No reason there is no embedded web interface. That is such an easy thing to do. Like routers have been doing for ages.

        • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          what if you don’t even know what that stuff is or how to use it even if it were available?

          • Norodix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then it still doesn’t take away anything from you. How would an additional embedded web based control panel impact you negatively? If you don’t use it just don’t use it. But it ensures longevity and makes the device entirely self-contained.

  • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    hearing about shoes that need an app makes me want to stab myself in the testicle.

    • dustycups@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?

      • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Those people could just as easily buy slip-ons, which serve the same purpose while not requiring an app (or any other form of electronics, for that matter).

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are shoes that you don’t need tho tie that don’t need an app and most importantly are not from nike.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    People who bought these are fucking idiots and they deserve much worse then their stupid fucking smart shoes turning into abandonware.

    Maybe we wouldn’t have so much shit in landfills if those idiots didn’t gobble up any piece of trash someone wants to sell them.

    • Cornpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I could see handicapped people being interested in these. Fuck then I guess right.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Sure. We totally didn’t have footwear that did not require lacing. Thank god for the tech bro solution. What would the disadvantaged people do if it wasn’t for the free market!

        Btw, you really think their app was accessible to handicapped people?

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Allowing these companies to ever sell anything with the “cloud” marketing was a colossal mistake. Not only it was a waste of people’s money, but now also e-waste

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    In a world where I can slip my shoes on and off without untying them, why would I need shoes that can self-tie?

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Probably overkill and possibly even overly complicated for an MCU.

      This probably just requires some good old reverse engineering the original apps bluetooth API and an app to connect to the shoes.

      If they’re really lucky, it’s simple unencrypted packets they can just capture via Wireshark, but I really haven’t looked into it any further than this article summary, so I could be wrong.

      If if they can work by simple packet replay, that would be the most simple, and definitely doable by the Flipper.

  • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    To be fair, anyone who thought their life needed SaaS supported shoe laces, definitely had this coming.

    In terms of cosmic corporate evildoers, Nike may not currently be a top ranked contender, but their definitely an old school hall of fame level player.

    So while not saying they were doing the world a favor by dropping cloud shoe lace support, I am saying that the situation is hilarious.