Abigail Disney, the granddaughter to Roy O. Disney, who cofounded The Walt Disney Company, told CNBC on Thursday that she plans to withhold donations to the party she has funded for years until Biden drops out. The president has said he has no plans to withdraw from the race, despite calls for him to do so.

“I intend to stop any contributions to the party unless and until they replace Biden at the top of the ticket. This is realism, not disrespect. Biden is a good man and has served his country admirably, but the stakes are far too high,” Abigail Disney said in a lengthy statement to CNBC. “If Biden does not step down the Democrats will lose. Of that I am absolutely certain. The consequences for the loss will be genuinely dire.”

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    All the wealthy Plutocrats have seen this was a great opportunity to steal the nomination from the people.

    Well steal it more anyway.

    • ShepherdPie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nomination from the people? We never had a choice in the first place.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Primaries work, but nobody votes in them. We got Clinton because she won the primaries in 2016, we got Biden because he won the primaries in 2020.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            In the 2016 DNC Primaries:

            15,805,136 people voted for Hillary Clinton before considering Delegate allotment, 16,847,084 after.

            12,029,699 people voted for Bernie Sanders.

            If we didn’t have a nation of 340 Million Fuckwits then maybe we could get more than 5% of the population to select our future leaders.

            • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Oh, come on. You can’t justify a corrupt process by pointing to the final results of the corrupt process.

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                No but I can justify a democratic process by pointing to the much much higher number of people voting for the candidate who won.

                • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  …In an unfair election with the organizing body tipping the scale all throughout the process. So no, you can’t point to the votes to wave away the corruption that influenced those votes.

                • ShepherdPie
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  That’s like claiming McDonalds makes the best burger because they sell the most.