A projection of how the election results would look if we used Additional Member System (AMS), like in Scotland and Wales.
Party | AMS | FPTP | Seat change |
---|---|---|---|
Labour | 236 | 411 | +175 |
LibDems | 77 | 71 | -6 |
Green | 42 | 4 | -38 |
SNP | 18 | 9 | -9 |
Plaid Cymru | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Reform | 94 | 5 | -89 |
Conservative | 157 | 121 | -36 |
Northern Ireland | 18 | 18 | 0 |
Other | 4 | 6 | +2 |
I just had a brief look at AMS on Wikipedia but I’m struggling to understand it. They say it’s less proportional than MMP as used in New Zealand and Germany, but the brief description of how AMS works sounded very much like how MMP works. What’s the difference?
From Wikipedia:
The less intuitive the system is, the less empowered the voters feel, and the more the system will be gamed. And all voting systems can be gamed.
But MMP does that. I don’t understand how that description differs from regular MMP.