• sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    Your assumption assumes a preference between two candidates. I have no preference.

    • naun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      There is no assumption on my part about a preference between two candidates.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you have no preference between a self avowed dictator and a milquetoast politician, I question if your head is roundish or if there’s a large flat spot where part of your head was caved in.

      Because you can’t be naturally so stupid to be ambivalent to the country falling to a fascist who wants to genocide multiple groups, can you?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The question is do you have a preference in being able to express potential future preferences?

      As bad as it has been, the R team went absurdly beyond in late 2020 with respect to refusing to recognize the result of an election, trying to use fake electors, by pushing to reject the certification of the electors, and a lot of people campaigning for board of elections to “ensure Republican victories”.

      They are openly working to establish a China-like system where there’s only one viable “party”.