Title. I’ve heard some say it is because the storyline is incoherent compared to the prior two movies.
It was a world building movie. It showed more of the world’s decline and what was left in it. It was the issues of a comic book between the 6 issue story arcs. Beyond this, I cannot give you a solid yes or no.
I’m amazed that this C/ exists.
But, no. It was perfect at the time. It built on that world in a very interesting way, despite the flaws. Incoherent would be grossly inaccurate. Could it use better editing? Absolutely. But the story is there, you can follow it without difficulty.
I loved it as much or more than the first movie tbh, flaws and all.
Plus, c’mon, Tina Turner? How can you hate that?
Nothing wrong with that :)
Have you ever considered going through the rest of George Miller’s filmography?
I did it recently (following along with a podcast that was doing the same). It’s a weird and fascinating journey haha.
The first half is great. The second half is pretty rough tho.
¯\(ツ)/¯
Doctor Miller is a mystery
