Too obvious that it was a swastika in my opinion. But as step three you could turn it into an abstract loss, at least that would take the attention away from the original shape.
So, this begs the question if it is better to leave it at a stage where it’s visible that “Le Resistance” has happened, or is it better to cover it completely so nobody is exposed to the original symbol in the first place.
Could just paint it over in all black if the latter is the goal.
I kinda like the idea of drawing a garbage can or other mockery around it, so people can see that there was a Nazi and this is what we think of them.
I also don’t think anyone will turn Nazi from seeing a swatiska. People should be exposed to and educated on what it is.
Too obvious that it was a swastika in my opinion. But as step three you could turn it into an abstract loss, at least that would take the attention away from the original shape.
Fight swastikas with loss
So, this begs the question if it is better to leave it at a stage where it’s visible that “Le Resistance” has happened, or is it better to cover it completely so nobody is exposed to the original symbol in the first place.
Could just paint it over in all black if the latter is the goal.
I kinda like the idea of drawing a garbage can or other mockery around it, so people can see that there was a Nazi and this is what we think of them.
I also don’t think anyone will turn Nazi from seeing a swatiska. People should be exposed to and educated on what it is.
I think the reason is to replace the hakenkreuz with something more positive, and as bonus point nazis are gonna hate the evil rainbow
Yeah, this treatment is for either public graffiti where the original moron will see the new version, or maybe reformed Nazis who had a tattoo