A BIPARTISAN SAMPLING of the worldās greatest perpetrators and enablers of political violence has rushed to condemn political violence following the shooting attempt on former President Donald Trump on Saturday.
āThe idea that thereās political violence ā¦ in America like this, is just unheard of, itās just not appropriate,ā said President Joe Biden, the backer of Israelās genocidal war against Palestine, with a death toll that researchers believe could reach 186,000 Palestinians. Bidenās narrower point was correct, though: Deadly attacks on the American ruling class are vanishingly rare these days. Political violence that is not ālike thisā ā the political violence of organized abandonment, poverty, militarized borders, police brutality, incarceration, and deportation ā is commonplace.
And condemn it, most everyone in the Democratic political establishment has: āPolitical violence is absolutely unacceptable,ā wrote Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on X. āThere is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy,ā tweeted former President Barack Obama, who oversaw war efforts and military strikes against Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, and Pakistan with massive civilian death tolls; Obama added that we should āuse this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics.ā āThere is no place for political violence, including the horrific incident we just witnessed in Pennsylvania,ā wrote Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
The chorus of condemnation was predictable and not in itself a problem: Thereās nothing wrong with desiring a world without stochastic assassination attempts, even against political opponents. But when you have Israelās minister of foreign affairs, Israel Katz of the fascistic ruling Likud Party, tweeting, āViolence can never ever be part of politics,ā the very concept of āpolitical violenceā is evacuated of meaning.
Pretty much the entirety of mainstream political speech boils down to the Elites being special and what is good and proper for them is not the same as what is good and proper for the rest, both in terms of what they can do and what can be done to them.
And this is in all political regimes, Democracy as much as Autocracy.
So the only surprise there can be in this comes from generally in Democracy the āwe are different from youā kind of speech tends to be far more subtle and indirect (say, justifying politicians exclusion from certain surveillance laws due to their āresponsibilitiesā or having law apply differently to ābusinessesā which is just a way to act towards the wealth of the Owner class differently than towards that of the Worker class), so some people hadnāt yet spotted how throroughly normalized and generally applied the double standard of the Elites is.
For anybody trying to look at the forest rather than getting fixated on individual trees, this stuff is immediately obvious as absolutely within the general pattern of behaviour of these people (itās the mainstream politicians that do NOT think like this that are the exceptional ones).