• taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    Kind of makes you wonder how many shootings get quietly thwarted. Not just “guy in a roof not allowed to bring gun” kind of situations but also “weirdo posts anti-trump stuff on Lemmy and isn’t allowed to attend”.

    I know the kidnapping attempt on the governer was the latter and publicized but who knows if they let the media know about all of them. There’s a lot of freaking people capable of this stuff in a country full of guns.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Question: As a non-American and therefore with no gun or weapon knowledge, what is the range of riffles or commonly available guns that one could buy off a regular gun shop?

    • DragonTypeWyvern
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      He used an AR-15 which in theory is accurate to about 300m for a proficient shooter, but amateur shooters shouldn’t really expect more than 100m. If he hadn’t fallen for the marketing campaign he’d have just used a deer rifle and probably gotten the bastard for half the cost.

      That all said, a lot of rifles have theoretical effective ranges that only apply to top marksmen, so anything would have worked if he’d had a steadier aim, but that’s easier said than done.

      • mbfalzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        My basic training was with an M16A2 manufactured in the 80s and after a couple hours and ~100 rounds of practice I could group center with iron sights at 500y (457m) and that’s functionally the same gun. Effective range for an AR-15 should be the same 600y(550m) as the old M16s from the 70s and 80s, extended to ~1000y (914m) with extra training, better sights, and a match grade rifle

      • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        He probably also aimed for the head, which is way smaller target than body, especially in this case. In military training was mainly to shoot to body, because it really doesn’t matter in combat.

    • Cobrachicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depending on how the gun was configured/chambered, and weather conditions, I think it’s quite hard. Also considering he probably only had shooting range experience, and was a kid under heavy stress.

      Also not American, but at roughly the same age trained on the HK G3, which uses a bigger caliber and longer barrel, under simulated stress conditions could hit a target at about 400m reliably. After intensive training, and “hit a target” does not necessarily mean a headshot, but somewhere on the body. We were explicitly told to aim for the biggest mass, not fanciness.

      I think that shooter was misguided in many ways, and also by advertising, as already mentioned in this thread.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The only way that guy got on the roof is if he was already familiar with the building. My guess is that he worked there at some point. You couldn’t have gotten onto that property from the venue.

    Edit Google maps got in the back lot somehow:

    Easy climbing access from their west lot:

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man this really was the dump assignment for the Secret Service’s worst agents, wasn’t it.