• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Which number 2 blows my mind as they constantly vote for things which benefit those well “above their station” because they think they’ll be there someday.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t believe conservatives are trying to argue they need to change their class. They just assume they are already the highest, and its some other group’s fault that the conservative is poor.

    • ElJefe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      My friend ran into a mutual acquaintance; dude’s now a majorly homophobic, anti trans, anti lgbtq, far right, freedumb convoy supporting redneck. You know the type. He’s ranting about how social programs need to be defunded and all the gays do is take and don’t contribute. My buddy then goes “so anyway, how’ve you been?” Dude says “oh I’m great! I got laid off so now I’m on employment insurance.”

      Their hypocrisy and tone deafness know no bounds.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      because they think they’ll be there someday.

      Sadly, I think its even worse than you’re describing. They think they are at that higher station now and its rule #1 that is preventing them from actualizing it. As in “I’m not experiencing a luxurious lifestyle because Group X is taking my share”.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t think it’s even that anymore. I think it’s just genuine fawning sycophancy towards their “betters.” They think privileged people deserve even more privilege by virtue of having “won,” even at their own expense. It’s sick and psychotic and completely foreign to my way of thinking, but I don’t think I’m wrong.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You are wrong though. The reason we can’t understand it is they are being manipulated. Christians in particular have made themselves vulnerable, purposefully. Just go back to your Sunday school days and if you didn’t have them listen to the TV preachers in earnest. They are the sheep, they are being led. I’m not trying to be offense it’s just the facts. Even the trumpers who are church adverse fall for similar structures. Usually satellites of the church at large. Biggest facet I can think of is the gun nuts. It’s basically religion. In the 2A they trust. The overlap of the church gives them the same structure. Making them vulnerable to manipulation.

        You and me too though. We just kinda sweep it under the rug. We let our phones run our lives. We feed on dopamine hits all day everyday.

    • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or they think that the people above their station deserve those benefits–they genuinely think and support the rich getting richer is a good thing, regardless of whether they’ll see any benefit themselves. It’s the mirror image of the progressive mindset of voting to raise their own taxes to help the needy.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not really as much as I feel we think. Having read more about Authoritarian mindsets, which includes the rank and file authoritarians, not just the leadership, they’re actually happy to be reinforcing the hierarchy regardless of their position in it. They’re happy to know their place and to ensure the ranks are kept in place. It brings comfort to many people to know that their position, regardless of how awful it is, is being maintained properly.

      This means that they’re entirely okay with a dictator and/or an oligarchy as long as the people on the top are “supposed” to be there.