• ericjmorey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re probably cheering on the outsourcing of techworkers too, right? Who cares about the safety of the people building the things we want to buy cheaply, right?

    Protectionism can go too far and often does, but it isn’t unnecessary for healthy societies. Free, unregulated trade isn’t always the right answer.

    • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Unlike all the safety violations, stagnant wages, and corners cut by companies in this country?

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Protectionism is almost always because domestic automakers get complacent in their corner of the world and don’t want to innovate to compete. See how Harley Davidson benefitted from Reagan’s policies in limiting the imports of foreign bikes to the US. Ever since then almost all their bikes have looked like they’ve been stuck in the 1950s yet cost like how inflation would be like 20 years from now. Using underpaid American workers as an excuse to bring on these tariffs and bans just doesn’t convince me if we haven’t been innovating to improve technology or lower costs at the same time.

      • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        People want communities. They want healthy communities. Protectionism can facilitate healthy communities.

        Innovation at all costs is not what society in general wants. This is abundantly clear throughout history and modern society.