this video is not monetized this video is not about kris tyson this video is for educational purposes only this video features materials protected by the Fair Use guidelines of Section 107 of the Copyright Act. All rights reserved to the copyright owners. more to come.
  • sunzu@kbin.run
    703·
    4 months ago

    Dude is almost certainly a kiddy diddler too

    Is there some evidence to back this up?

    False accusation are counter productive esp when it related to egregious crime like this.

    So if we are gonna do it, it better be true…

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          71·
          4 months ago

          Esp in involving serious crimes.

          Every false accusation is used to discredit actual victims of crime.

          It is fucking disgusting how much false accusations we have by bad faith actors while real victims are not taken seriously because their story is not worthy of “news”

          People need to get better and judge this on evidence, no how good click bait it is.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        355·
        4 months ago
        1. That’s a different person.
        2. I thought that was already debunked as alleged victim said they were not a victim?

        Edit: victim said it was not grooming but inappropriate conversations did happen. Hopefully we get them posted here. But either way that allegations against MrBeast’s staff have merit and should be checked out by law enforcement

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            11·
            4 months ago

            Thank you for clarifying.

            Do you know what the actual allegations are?

            • authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
              82·
              4 months ago

              hmmm I thought I did, I saw a little bit on Twitter talking about the video essays discussing the allegations. And then the tweet from the alleged victim saying that it was nothing, and then a tweet from someone who I thought was the creator of one of the video essays saying that the above alleged victim was not actually one of the victims they talked about.

              But now I can’t find any of that exchange, or even the original video essays, and all the news outlets are referencing just that tweet from the alleged victim and only seem to be referencing a single victim, but that might just be that the news outlets are trying to post things too early

        • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
          11·
          4 months ago

          “I was not groomed” would just as easily come from someone being groomed as someone not, since the victim is unlikely to know it’s happening to them in the moment. IIRC, the chat logs for that situation were cancel-worthy by themselves - grooming accusations aside.

            • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
              1·
              4 months ago

              I’ve seen some screenshots sifting around, and it’ll take a minute for me to hunt those down.

              For now, here’s a xeet from the victim after rereading the chat logs directly.

              Edit: I forgot about this, woops. I did find a Redditch megathread about the issue that has some screenshots of discord chats. That is probably the best aggregation of info and evidence currently. Apologies about reddit.

              • sunzu@kbin.run
                2·
                4 months ago

                Thank you. Sounds like something that should be checked out by a prosecutor tbh

                We clearly see a pattern where these YouTube clowns are using YouTube for access. Law enforcement again ignoring it

                The new Catholic church 🤡