Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    • mlen@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Ugh, just reading the summary made me want to puke. What the fuck is wrong with those people. Who the fuck thinks that delegating the responsibility to computers is a good idea. Canā€™t they cope with the outcomes of their choices and need to outsource that responsibility to some magick software

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      wait wait wait wait this it not substack of some deranged fash techbro ghoul like balaji srinivasan, thatā€™s JAMA, are you sure these are actual MDs and not three techbros in a stolen labcoat

      one of them - first author - has three fluff pieces on genai in similar tone to their name, the other two, it seems to me, didnā€™t wrote a thing about ai earlier

      then again scott siskind exists, but this is not something that iā€™d expect even from him

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          anything newer than 2022? wonā€™t be on scihub, because scihub got in a court case in india, that they hope they can win and secure reasonably stable place where they can operate from

          tho it seems to me that the entire article is that three screens of text