• brokenlcd@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    276
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It seems like a flavour of the rubber duck method; by trying to explain it to a third party, you think about it in a different way and find a solution.

      • Phineaz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Trust me bro(ette): Rubber duck is the SHIT. I don’t even program save for a few rare instances, but any complex issue where you just know something is wrong but can’t quite put your finger on it? It works miracles. A lot better tbf if you are actually explaining it to someone who can ask questions, but any object that you can look at is a good substitute.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The rubber duck method is just another flavor of thinking out loud.

      • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it’s a bit more than that. I think that the idea is that you simplify the problem so that the rubber duck could understand it. Or at least reformulate it in order to communicate it clearly.

        It’s the simplification, reformulation or reorganisation that helps to get the breakthrough.

        Just thinking out loud isn’t quite the same thing.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          The small but important differences are what makes it another flavor.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              As far as I am aware it is a regional difference in spelling, and that is what I get when searching for definitions.

              What small but importance difference are you referring to?

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Explain why “flavor” is wrong, as if I was a rubber duck. You can use any help you like, including a dictionary.

        • Emerald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          thinking out loud

          When your legs don’t work like they used to before

          And I can’t sweep you off of your feet

      • kwomp2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Even though this is true for like 90% of my thinking (that I can see when I try), so far I’m concinced this ist because I am a predominantly language-and-normal-grammar-rules thinker.

        There are people that mostly think via associations of words that don’t have to be formulated/ cast into grammar.

        And then there supposedly people mainly thinking in pictures or smth, without words.

        Anyways for some people rubber duck mode reoresents a change in thinking method, I think

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, saying thinks out loud requires a different change in thinking because you are verbalizing the thoughts in addition to approaching it as an explanation instead of just an understanding. I know how a phone works, but describing how it works is a different thing from knowing. The duck is just a stand in for someone else to get the mindset of explaining

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m one of the latter that doesn’t really think in words, and a LOT of the time, thoughts have to be greatly simplified or at least much more organized to be stated in clear sentences. It’s that pause-and-refine that often gets the breakthrough for me. Sometimes it takes clear until I’m trying to put it in understandable sentences instead of a big ramble, but it still largely boils down to ACTUALLY stopping the task work to loop back over the landscape.

          A lot of people do the same thing physically. Like when you’re climbing a big ladder and suddenly realize how high up you are, or how unstable the ladder is. Just a pause and broadening of attention is often enough to cue different thoughts and realizations.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve been using it like that. I have been trying to program this macropad thing I bought that uses python without having done much programming and it has yet to give me a solution that works. But in the course of explaining to it why whatever it gave me doesn’t work I’ve made a lot of progress so that’s nice at least.

    • frezik
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      And all we needed was the electricity of a good sized industrial nation state.

      • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        She didn’t actually submit it though, so it shouldn’t have needed to process it and use up that electricity.

        • frezik
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          She didn’t, but the equipment had to exist and suck up electricity for her to get that far.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      yep, came to say the same thing.

      Sometimes thinking of the problem in a different way, such as describing it to another person, can help you look at it from a different direction and realize the problem.

    • cman6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ha, I never knew this had an actual name.

      I thought it was known as talking to a brick wall, ie. if you have a issue talk to a brick wall and you’ll get the answer

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s got more than a name, too: it’s got a Wikipedia page! Part of my job is IT support for normies, and I love sharing that with clients (because of course they’ve not heard of it). Usually gets a laugh, and I like to think they adopt the term and “rubber duck” things in their daily life thereafter.

    • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Except that you are paid to make the rubber duck do most of the work, not do most of the work yourself.

  • DrFuggles@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 months ago

    To be fair, I’ve written countless stack overflow posts detailing my problems in hope someone would be able to spot the mistake or error only for me to realize what it was along the way and never even submitting it.

    And I didn’t even need a 🦆 for it

    • Contravariant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Education has really failed to impress upon people the importance of asking questions. It’s amazing how much time is wasted on making people learn answers to questions they don’t even know how to ask.

      • sharkbelly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        The most valuable tool I ever got (as a tutor/teacher) was Socratic Questioning. Students not only benefit from its application but it also helps to impress upon them the value (and relative skill) to asking thoughtful questions.

        I don’t mean to sound like a Mom for Liberty, but to my mind, the American public education system (probably others) is not about developing intelligence but rather preparing children for work and keeping them busy/safe while their parents work, and I’d argue it’s not very good at its primary function. The ones who escape with curiosity, capacity, and confidence intact are woefully rare if you care about power to the people and thankfully rare if you care about keeping people easy to control.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          On top of that, it doesn’t even do a good job of preparing kids for work since the majority of jobs will be in a team based environment while schools focus on individual/isolated learning almost exclusively.

          The modern school system was largely developed around the early 1900s with the intent of creating factory line workers: people who could remember and perform 2 or 3 repetitive tasks. This is further compounded by the rise of standardized testing, which provides a good base level for quality of subjects across the range of individual teacher’s skills but has become an administrative crutch that puts test scores above everything else, leading to a cycle where kids are taught only to remember stuff long enough to pass the next test and then dump it from memory for the next set of test subjects.

          Schooling needs a major revision from the ground up for the modern age.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think that’s why questions aren’t asked. I find questions aren’t asked because of ego. Nobody wants to look like they don’t know things. Lots of people will judge others for asking questions. I’m a question guy and it always surprised me how other people just knew things and didn’t ask questions. But I soon started to realize that they don’t know as much as they want others to think. They just have a high value for more independent thinking.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, it’s a well known technique in programming called “rubber duck debugging”.

      The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging.

      But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It’s weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      You needed a duck. You used one. It didn’t really look like a duck but it served the same purpose.

      • DrFuggles@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        yeah, if it’s something that other people can actually profit from I usually post it anyway, but most of the time it’s “oh goddamn, there’s two commas in line 72 where there should only be one” kinda stuff

  • Maiq@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 months ago

    99% of the questions I was going to post to stack overflow were solved before I hit post. Something about really having to think through your problem to give people the most complete information about your problem as possible makes it easier to find the solution.

    I did just get a rubber ducky and I didn’t know what I should do with it till now.