JAMA Internal Medicine presents an opinion article: “Can Artificial Intelligence Speak for Incapacitated Patients at the End of Life?” The authors, three doctors from UCSF, don’t seem to have heard…
“Can AI do [Blank]” is getting pretty old. They will literally fill in that blank with anything they can come up with and it’s getting kinda silly.
Here’s a list of potential new AI articles I predict coming out within the next year:
“Can AI teach us more about the dinosaurs?”
“How AI will solve the climate crisis.”
“New AI technology let’s you speak with deceased loved ones with staggering accuracy.”
“How AI can help you save money.”
“New AI model lets us translate dead languages.”
“Soon all your friends will be AI.”
“AI can help you lose weight.”
“How we can use AI to find aliens.”
I’m sure at least one of these articles already exists. Literally all they are trying to do is make money with half baked ideas or steal your personal data.
We already know how to solve the climate crisis. We just don’t want to because it would cost too much, inconvenience us, and really upset the shareholders.
The only reason to ask AI would be like asking the butler to take out the trash, we just can’t be bothered to do even that much work and want to hit the “easy” button.
“Can AI do [Blank]” is getting pretty old. They will literally fill in that blank with anything they can come up with and it’s getting kinda silly.
Here’s a list of potential new AI articles I predict coming out within the next year:
“Can AI teach us more about the dinosaurs?” “How AI will solve the climate crisis.” “New AI technology let’s you speak with deceased loved ones with staggering accuracy.” “How AI can help you save money.” “New AI model lets us translate dead languages.” “Soon all your friends will be AI.” “AI can help you lose weight.” “How we can use AI to find aliens.”
I’m sure at least one of these articles already exists. Literally all they are trying to do is make money with half baked ideas or steal your personal data.
a fun little rule of thumb that I like to apply is that whenever an article’s headline is a question you may safely presume the answer is usually no.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge’s_law_of_headlines
I propose the Gerard Extension for Betteridge’s Law: by appending ‘, and what the hell is wrong with you?’ to Betteridge’s output.
As per the headline.
* The Castor-Gerard Extension
worst prog rock band ever
They literally mentioned this in the article.
done already
pretty sure I’ve seen this
done
done
done
pretty sure japan already has this problem
i’d be shocked if not already done
pretty sure I’ve seen this
i think these are predictions of last week
The great thing about using AI to search for aliens is that it’ll find them, whether there’s any out there or not.
I remember reading not to long ago about people having AI as girlfriends.
And then the company behind it made the AI girlfriends less horny unless you paid for the premium plan.
gotchu covered
This is the Blade Runner 2024 made to the best of our abilities
The blade runner we have at home
We already know how to solve the climate crisis. We just don’t want to because it would cost too much, inconvenience us, and really upset the shareholders.
The only reason to ask AI would be like asking the butler to take out the trash, we just can’t be bothered to do even that much work and want to hit the “easy” button.
Sounds about right. And I’m sure at least half of them are just click bait while the others are wishful thinking. Or just sad…