I stumbled across a sports article from a US publication and thought it interesting that it showed the USA leading the medals table.

Instead of the regular table that gives weight to Gold, silver and bronze, they just see total medals.

I sorta like it. Celebrating all medal winners equally is nice. It feels a little like fudging the numbers, though.

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wonder how medal tally per capita would work out. Surely Australia would be up there. 🤔

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      That would be a really interesting metric.

      America get one medal per every 9,008,108people

      Australia gets one medal per 1,444,444 people

      China is one medal per 58,833,333 people

      So Australia is doing pretty well. I can’t be bothered doing it for any more countries right now though

      • Nath@aussie.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I played with something like “medals per capita” once during the London Olympics. When you put them into that metric, Australia definitely punches above its weight, but I think New Zealand did even better.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          So that’s objectively a worse measure then. We need a measure where were the best. Not NZ, not UK and not China or USA.

          How about medals divided by average population density inversed, lol.