FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoI don't think I'll continue using Arch, btwlemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1368arrow-down151
arrow-up1317arrow-down1imageI don't think I'll continue using Arch, btwlemmy.ohaa.xyzFQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squareriodoro1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down2·2 months ago shutdown a computer when you shouldn’t computer breaks how could a computer do this
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoPacman is very fast. The tradeoff is that it isn’t as “thoughtful” when it runs. It doesn’t have the same protections as apt or dnf. I especially like dnf as you can undo any operation.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoTo be fair a lot of Linux distros and other operating systems try to be careful on how they do things. Arch is the odd man out.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoPacman is very fast at the cost of safety checks and verification
Why would Arch do this?
Pacman is very fast. The tradeoff is that it isn’t as “thoughtful” when it runs. It doesn’t have the same protections as apt or dnf. I especially like dnf as you can undo any operation.
To be fair a lot of Linux distros and other operating systems try to be careful on how they do things. Arch is the odd man out.
How exactly?
Pacman is very fast at the cost of safety checks and verification