Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • hrrrngh@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    Ā·
    3 months ago

    Oh no. Kurzgesagt just published a full-on TREACLES piece.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa8k8IQ1_X0

    These are the sources they cited: https://sites.google.com/view/sources-superintelligence/

    Open Philanthropy is a sponsor of kurzgesagt. The foundation is supporting academic work across the field of Artificial Intelligence, and some of the sources used to create this script (from OpenAI, Future of Humanity Institute, Machine Intelligence Research Institute, Future of Life Institute and Epoch AI) also receive financial support from Open Philanthropy.

    Open Philanthropy had no influence on the content and messages of this video.

    Iā€™m sure!

    • Mii@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Theyā€™ve given me a strange vibe for a while. I suspected they might be in the TREACLES sphere, so I guess at least I finally have confirmation.

      Also, the amount of ā€œChatGPT is basically AGI alreadyā€ people in the comments is alarming.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        Also, the amount of ā€œChatGPT is basically AGI alreadyā€ people in the comments is alarming.

        They prob should do a video on this effect as shown by the early ELIZA experiments. That even the smartest people could get fooled by a dumb program. Doubt they will though if they are into EA stuff.

        • o7___o7@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          Ā·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I still maintain that ChatGPTā€™s main draw is as a Ouija board for weird nerds.

    • imadabouzu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Kurzgesagt

      Yeah Iā€™m not surprised. Kurzgesagt has always had that sort of forced, fragile, veneer of optimism and scientific inquiry that can only be described as ā€œall I can imagine about the future I read about in the 60sā€.

    • 13 barn owls in a trenchcoat@eldritch.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      @hrrrngh @froztbyte I was preeved about this, but was already starting to get sus because theyā€™ve previously touched on Effective Altrusim positively (without using the term) and seem uncomfortably longtermist, which really does concern me given the figures and philosophies involved.

      This is extra crap because Iā€™d already introduce the channel to younger family members as a learning resource that I wouldnā€™t have to fact-check to death, but apparently noooo.

    • BigMuffin69@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Some ā€˜scientistsā€™ cough Yud/Rob/Kokotajlo cough believe in FOOM. Anyways, letā€™s not question this fundamental assumption so we can engage in fear baiting and mental masturbation for the remainder of our show. Itā€™s bonkers that people keep citing Kokotajlo as an AI researcher, like, I have serious doubts this man knows what a computer is. Pretty good at grifting though. Also why is Rob Miles still listed as a PhD student. Like cant he hurry up and fuckin graduate already? Christ.

      As an aside, I remember watching a PBS space time and seeing sponsored by Open Philanthropy (or some other EA organization) and I was like no not my beloved PBS!! I know it feels :(

      • imadabouzu@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        Fwiw, this is also why I -do- think itā€™s important to talk more frankly about where science is moving towards ala things like FEP or scale free dynamics. An alternative story on things like what energy, computation, and participation really means, is useful, not for prescribing the future, but the opposite: putting ambiguity and the importance of participation back in it.

        The current world view, that some how things are cleanly separated and in nice little ontological boxes of capability and shape and form, lead to closed systems delusions. Itā€™s fragile and we know it, I hope. Von Neumanā€™s ā€œlast inventionā€ is wrong because most, unfortunately, most ā€œsmart peopleā€™sā€ view of intelligence has become reductive in liu of a bigger picture.

        In addition to our sneers, we should want to tell a more robust story about all of these things.

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Idea: a Pivot to AI video series hosted by an avatar thatā€™s, like, a talking polyhedron in the style of Mindā€™s Eye/Body Wars era CGI.

      This would require effort and thus is a terrible idea, but I find the mental image amusing.

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          Hatsune Miku but with my voice

          Thanks, this will be my dreams now for the rest of the month

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        we need to bring back machinima

        I call dibs on being represented by the left pong paddle, lovingly recorded from the analog output of an Atari Pong TTL standup (or FPGA equivalent)