• N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    The key to talking about things you don’t know about is to be loud, aggressive, and ridiculously confident in your beliefs. Project competency though you have none.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    What about learning these phrases instead:

    • I believe
    • I seem to recall
    • As I understand it
    • It seems to me that
    • In my experience

    In other words, make it clear to the reader what your level of skill or knowledge is.

    Whilst chewing on that, consider adding a source if you have one (or six).

    Source: I’ve been here a while and it’s stood me in good stead during online (and offline) conversation over the decades.

    • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      I fully support this, and I do this too. It saves me from looking like a dickhead. Honestly I won’t drop one of the “I believe” modifiers until after 10+ hours (usually 30+ hours) of not social media reading on a topic.

  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    But then how am I supposed to get angry and ridicule random people on the internet?

  • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, actually the opinion on the topic you are not informed about displays your values and having it might be beneficial to you.

    The problem is not in the people, the problem is in the propaganda

    • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      An example would be a parent who doesn’t want any gender-related issue to be discussed in the school.

      Are they inherently flawed and inherently hateful individuals? Probably not

      Do they think that the schools indoctrinate children and they do care about them? Probably that’s the case.

      • Dirt_Possum [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        the opinion on the topic you are not informed about displays your values and having it might be beneficial to you.

        And it might be detrimental to you just as easily. There’s no way to know which without being informed, but an ignorant opinion based on “values” (aka vibes and what you want to be true rather than what is true) is more likely to hurt you or others in the long run. Just as being a racist bigot who has a wrong opinion about people of color might find that holding their racist opinion is immediately beneficial to themselves if they’re in a similarly bigoted community, being a bigot is ultimately harmful for reasons I would hope wouldn’t need to be explained.

        An example would be a parent who doesn’t want any gender-related issue to be discussed in the school.

        Yet their uninformed opinion is harmful. Gender issues are inevitably part of our world and learning about them will not only prepare children to have an understanding of them that their ignorant parent lacks and help make the world safer and more livable for everyone as a result, but if that child themselves turns out to be gender stereotype non-conforming, then learning about those issues will help them better understand themselves and potentially save them from much of the misery inflicted on them by an ignorant populous.

        • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you don’t know that she has undescended testes, then. You just made it the fuck up. Even the XY thing is pretty contentious as this point. You should shut the fuck up when making judgements about other people’s sex organs, especially when it’s just conjecture.

            • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              3 months ago

              There’s no source that she has testes, that’s all fully made up and you should be ashamed of yourself for repeating that.

              Again, the XY thing is pretty sus and even normal lib sources don’t believe it.

              I hope you spend the rest of your life having people talk shit about your genitals. Really.

                • ButtBidet [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m just gonna quote Wikipedia as I’m lazy. Tldr: it’s complicated.

                  Following Khelif’s victory over Italy’s Angela Carini during the 2024 Olympic Games, rumours surfaced on social media about her gender. These were fuelled by Khelif’s disqualification from the 2023 Women’s World Boxing Championships organised by the Russian-led International Boxing Association (IBA) after allegedly failing unspecified gender eligibility tests.[4][5] This disqualification happened three days after Khelif defeated a previously unbeaten Russian prospect, thus restoring the Russian boxer’s undefeated record.[6] The IBA’s Olympic status was later revoked due to governance issues as well as judging and refereeing corruption. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) and its Paris Boxing Unit stated Khelif was eligible to compete in the Olympics, and criticized the IBA’s previous disqualification as “sudden and arbitrary” and taken “without any due process”.[7] No medical evidence that Khelif has XY chromosomes or elevated levels of testosterone has been published.[8] Khelif was born female and identifies as female.[9]