• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Man the english language makes no sense.

          the sound in lose is the same sound as we are taught “oo” makes.

          Couldn’t a more straightforward language be chosen as the global one ffs

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            My father (who had a PhD in English) used to tell me that “ghoti” was pronounced “fish”

            GH as in rouGH
            O as in wOmen
            TI as in raTIon

            • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              How do you pronounce women? When I put those sounds together it makes more of a fush or fosh than fish .

              Or do you say fish different than me?

            • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              That isn’t really consistent with English orthography.

              But you can write “pfysche”, and that would be consistent with English.

          • vxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            There’s also loose and they sound the same but mean different things.

            Loose is when your pants is too wide.

            Lose is when the pants were so wide that you lost them.

            • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Lucy’s loose legwear lost latitude, leisurely lowering, leaving Lucy’s legs largely liberated. Lamentably, Lucy’s lost leggings landed listlessly, loitering lifelessly.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

              Man looking a thesaurus is fun Lol

              • vxx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Interesting, I didn’t know that. FYI, there’s the phonetic transcription that saves us from using other words to describe a pronunciation.

                luːz - lose

                luːs - loose

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think they sound different, loose ends with a curt “s” sound, while lose ends with a longer “z” sound.

          • brenstar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Loose could really be tightened up if it could just lose one of those Os

              • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ooh, also its accent, this is not a thing couplet for me

                Discount, viscount, load and broad,
                Toward, to forward, to reward,

                Nor it’s immediate predecessor,

                Banquet is not nearly parquet,
                Which exactly rhymes with khaki.

                Parquet isn’t in my vocabulary, but doesn’t seem to rhyme with khaki in any common dialect either way.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      When I was a kid, Scholastic did a “kids pick the president” poll. It was 1984 and John Glenn was running. I voted for him because he was an astronaut and The Right Stuff had come out a year before so I also thought he was basically Ed Harris. (I was 7.)

      Jesse Jackson won. I was disappointed at the time. I’m not a fan of Jackson’s, but I’d still have taken him over 4 more years of Reagan.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, but maybe one day President Kelly? He seems like a interesting person, though I don’t know all of his policy stances